- ..-- Modern woman
It was 6.00 AM. The alarm keeps ringing and I have no strength to
throw against the wall.
was finished.
I would not want to exercise today.
I stay home, cook my lunch, listening to music, twittiando, etc.
If I had a dog, I would walk around. All but out of
bed, put first and put the brain to function.
I WOULD LIKE TO KNOW WHO WAS THE WITCH, THE MATRIX OF FEMINIST THAT HAD
CLAIMING THE UNHAPPY IDEA OF THE RIGHTS OF WOMEN AND WHY DID ESO
WITH us who were born after it.
It was so good at the time of our grandmothers, they spent all
day embroidering, exchanging recipes with friends, teaching
another secret seasonings, tuco, home remedies, reading good
library books from their husbands, decorating the house, mowing
trees, planting flowers, picking vegetables from the gardens and educating
their children. Life was a great course for craftsmen, alternative medicine and
kitchen.
a twinkie WINE UNTIL ANY WHERE YOU LIKED THE BODICE AND
Inconsistent POLLUTION TO SEVERAL OTHER RARE WILD IDEAS ON
"OUR AREA WE WILL CONQUER." THAT AREA OR NOTHING!
We had the whole house, the neighborhood, the world at our feet.
We had complete mastery over men, they depended on us
with eating, dressing and to be seen in front of his friends, what the hell
wanted to give us rights?
Now they are confused, do not know what role they play in
society FLEE AS \u200b\u200bWE CROSS THE DEVIL.
That joke, that grace, gets covered in homework.
And worst of all, ended up throwing us into the dungeon of singleness
SHARP.
past, marriages lasted forever.
Why, tell me why sex that had all the best, only
needed to be fragile and be guided through life, began racing
males?
BICEPS LOOK AT THE SIZE OF THEM AND CHECK OUT OUR SIZE.
was singing, that was not going to end well.
can not stand being forced the daily ritual of being skinny as a broom
but nargan tits and stops, for which I have to kill me in
gym besides dying of hunger, spend moisturizers,
other weapons to avoid falling overcome by old age makeup flawlessly
every morning from the front of the neck, have your hair neat and not
behind to dye the gray hair is worse than leprosy, choose well
clothing, shoes and accessories, not that is not presentable to
this meeting.
take it anymore I have to decide what perfume combined with my humor, or
having to run to stay bottled up in traffic and have
to solve half the things on the cell phone, running the risk of being
assaulted, attack die, settle the whole day in front of the PC
l (modern, of course), with a phone in the ear and
a problem solving after another, to go with red eyes
(for the monitor, of course, to mourn for love no time).
We are paying the price for being always in shape, no gouges,
plucked, smiling, fragrant, perfect nails, let alone the
impeccable resume -
we become "Super Woman" ... BUT UNLESS THEY CONTINUE WINNING.
was not better, much better to continue knitting in rocking chair?
ENOUGH !!!!!!!!!!!!!! ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ I want someone to open the door for me
might happen, to run the chair when I'm going to sit, please send me
flowers, little notes to poems, serenading me in the window.
If we already knew we had a brain and we could use.
quééééé had to prove it to them ??????
AM abdicate my position as a modern woman. Does anyone else
SUMA ??????????
by MAITENA
Web Notes And Notes Programming - Dev Blog - Ricardo Obregón
Tuesday, May 10, 2011
Friday, May 6, 2011
What Tile Goes Nicely With Blue Stone Coping
Comments on Sensors II: The resolution and size of the photosite. Sensors
As we saw in the table SENSORS, which can be read online or download it to your computer, an Olympus camera with a four thirds sensor (Four Thirds), has a size equal to a photosite Canon 60D, 7D, T3i and the like. View SENSORS II.
remember that the quality of the picture depends on the quality of the lens used, the size of the photosite, and algorithms (programs) for processing each manufacturer operates through its processors within its chambers .
With the lens I use, the optical quality is well above the average size photosites of the same, and the level of processing is more than good.
So now we see where the difference is because the APS-C sensors are larger than four thirds sensor, because the former has an area of \u200b\u200b337.27 mm. square, while the latter have mm.cuadrados 224.90. That is, APS-C sensors are 50% larger than the four-thirds. Thus
Canon cameras listed above have a resolution of 18 megapixels, versus the 12 that got my Olympus. Given the size of their sensors, may have the same quality as my Olympus, with a resolution 50% higher.
Well and all that resolution ... it good for?: The resolution is a measure of quantity, not quality ... we agree? ... estonces, more "quantity" will have a file with more units of information (pixels), which will serve primarily to two things: to make larger prints, and crop photos without losing much information
To give you an idea with my 12 megapixel me I can print photos of 40 x 30 cm. no problem, and working properly seat the file with a resolution enhancement bicubic interpolation in Photoshop, I made some pretty good prints up to 100 x 75 cm. I put this
for stakeholders to have a parameter on the subject of the resolution, and if they are fans of quality rather than size (40 x 30 to 60 x 30 are good sizes), and need photos with very little noise, no cone forget that there are cameras Nikon D 700, with 12 megapixels, but with really huge photosites (nearly 56 square microns in area).
As we saw in the table SENSORS, which can be read online or download it to your computer, an Olympus camera with a four thirds sensor (Four Thirds), has a size equal to a photosite Canon 60D, 7D, T3i and the like. View SENSORS II.
remember that the quality of the picture depends on the quality of the lens used, the size of the photosite, and algorithms (programs) for processing each manufacturer operates through its processors within its chambers .
With the lens I use, the optical quality is well above the average size photosites of the same, and the level of processing is more than good.
So now we see where the difference is because the APS-C sensors are larger than four thirds sensor, because the former has an area of \u200b\u200b337.27 mm. square, while the latter have mm.cuadrados 224.90. That is, APS-C sensors are 50% larger than the four-thirds. Thus
Canon cameras listed above have a resolution of 18 megapixels, versus the 12 that got my Olympus. Given the size of their sensors, may have the same quality as my Olympus, with a resolution 50% higher.
Well and all that resolution ... it good for?: The resolution is a measure of quantity, not quality ... we agree? ... estonces, more "quantity" will have a file with more units of information (pixels), which will serve primarily to two things: to make larger prints, and crop photos without losing much information
To give you an idea with my 12 megapixel me I can print photos of 40 x 30 cm. no problem, and working properly seat the file with a resolution enhancement bicubic interpolation in Photoshop, I made some pretty good prints up to 100 x 75 cm. I put this
for stakeholders to have a parameter on the subject of the resolution, and if they are fans of quality rather than size (40 x 30 to 60 x 30 are good sizes), and need photos with very little noise, no cone forget that there are cameras Nikon D 700, with 12 megapixels, but with really huge photosites (nearly 56 square microns in area).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)